Dear Colleagues:
|
We are interested in learning about your experience during the NATO Workshop. The information you provide will be used to improve the quality of future workshops we organize as well as to provide feedback to our sponsors on the appropriate format for similar workshops. The on-line form that you submit is anonymous (i.e. we will not be able to identify the author). Please check the appropriate boxes in questions 1-9 and provide written comments for the question 10.
If you have any good pictures from Venice conference that you would like to share with other participans please send them to Elena at belinkaia@risktrace.com.
|
| 1.In general, the workshop was
|
|
Poor
Not good
Average
Good
Excellent
|
|
|
|
2.Scientific quality and general level of plenary presentations was
|
|
Poor
Not good
Average
Good
Excellent
|
|
|
|
3. Working group discussions were
|
| Completely useless
Not very useful
Average
Useful
Very useful
|
|
|
|
4. The influence of the papers and discussions during the workshop on my future professional activities was
|
| Negligible
Weak
Average
Strong
Overwhelming
|
|
|
|
5. This workshop as a source of new ideas and information was
|
| Poor
Not good
Average
Good
Excellent
|
|
|
|
6. This workshop, as a tool to establish collaboration with colleagues, compared to other workshops and conferences, was
|
